SMCP vs. ABLS
Compare and contrast key facts about AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS).
SMCP and ABLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMCP is a passively managed fund by AlphaMark Advisors that tracks the performance of the Actively Managed. It was launched on Apr 20, 2015. ABLS is a passively managed fund by Abacus that tracks the performance of the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025. Both SMCP and ABLS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SMCP vs. ABLS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMCP vs. ABLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% |
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | -4.31% |
Returns By Period
SMCP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABLS
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -7.29%
- 6M
- -9.19%
- 1Y
- -8.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMCP vs. ABLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMCP vs. ABLS — Risk / Return Rank
SMCP
ABLS
SMCP vs. ABLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCP | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.64 | — |
Dividends
SMCP vs. ABLS - Dividend Comparison
SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.16%.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 15.16% | 14.04% |
Drawdowns
SMCP vs. ABLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ABLS drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and ABLS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCP | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -19.28% | +19.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.37% | +15.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.50% | +8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.83% | — |
Volatility
SMCP vs. ABLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMCP | ABLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 21.07% | -21.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.99% | -21.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 21.99% | -21.99% |