SMCP vs. HDV
SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCP is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. SMCP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
SMCP vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMCP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -25.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
SMCP vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | -25.99% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | -0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCP and HDV is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | -0.24 |
SMCP vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMCP
HDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
SMCP
HDV
Industrials
SMCP
HDV
Technology
SMCP
HDV
Healthcare
SMCP
HDV
Consumer Defensive
SMCP
HDV
Basic Materials
SMCP
HDV
Energy
SMCP
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
SMCP
HDV
Communication Services
SMCP
HDV
Real Estate
SMCP
HDV
-
Utilities
SMCP
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCP vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
SMCP
HDV
SMCP vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMCP | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.43 | 0.72 | -2.16 |
Drawdowns
SMCP vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCP | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.86% | -37.04% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -2.54% | -23.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -3.09% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility
SMCP vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCP | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.62% | 9.73% | +33.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 12.82% | +30.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.62% | 15.73% | +27.89% |
SMCP vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCP vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCP and HDV have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SMCP.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.00% for SMCP.
SMCP is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while HDV is Dividend. SMCP tracks Actively Managed, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: AlphaMark Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SMCP and 0.08% for HDV.
Find the right allocation for SMCP and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer