SMCI vs. EAT
SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. SMCI operates in Computer Hardware (Technology), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, SMCI returned 27.77%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for EAT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SMCI vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCI achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 11.01% return. Over the past 10 years, SMCI has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 27.77%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.68% annualized return.
SMCI
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- 4.07%
- 6M
- -5.78%
- 1Y
- -29.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.64%
- 5Y*
- 52.73%
- 10Y*
- 27.77%
EAT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 26.08%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -9.63%
- 3Y*
- 62.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
SMCI vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 4.07% | -3.97% | 7.23% | 246.24% | 86.80% | 38.82% | 31.81% | 74.06% | -34.07% | -25.38% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 11.01% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCI and EAT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SMCI and EAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SMCI:
$20.52B
EAT:
$7.09B
SMCI:
$2.70
EAT:
$10.14
SMCI:
11.27
EAT:
15.71
SMCI:
0.25
EAT:
0.36
SMCI:
0.60
EAT:
1.27
SMCI:
2.71
EAT:
17.46
SMCI:
$33.70B
EAT:
$5.73B
SMCI:
$2.83B
EAT:
$3.45B
SMCI:
$1.47B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCI vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
SMCI
EAT
SMCI vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCI | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.22 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | -0.44 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCI vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCI drawdown since its inception was -84.84%, roughly equal to the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCI and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCI | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.84% | -88.40% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.18% | -44.41% | -21.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.84% | -45.92% | -38.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.84% | -65.54% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.84% | -84.94% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.36% | -15.77% | -58.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.98% | -24.33% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.34% | 21.77% | +17.57% |
Volatility
SMCI vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a higher volatility of 44.32% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 15.23%. This indicates that SMCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCI | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.32% | 15.23% | +29.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.32% | 36.27% | +40.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.20% | 46.95% | +38.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.53% | 49.04% | +37.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.19% | 55.13% | +16.06% |
Dividends
SMCI vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SMCI nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SMCI vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super Micro Computer, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SMCI vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
SMCI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
SMCI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported an operating income of 625.87M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
SMCI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCI and EAT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCI has higher volatility (44.32%) compared to EAT (15.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCI dropped -84.84% vs EAT's -88.40%.
EAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCI and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer