PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCF vs. IJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMCF vs. IJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than IJS's 15.13% return.


SMCF

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.63%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IJS

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.29%
YTD
15.13%
6M
14.62%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMCF vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
13.75%9.56%16.30%4.47%
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
15.13%6.54%7.33%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and IJS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.85

The correlation between SMCF and IJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMCF vs. IJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMCF
IJS

Financial Services

50.0%
19.8%

Energy

18.2%
7.6%

Technology

11.0%
11.3%

Industrials

9.8%
11.6%

Healthcare

4.4%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
15.9%

Communication Services

1.5%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

0.6%
7.1%

Real Estate

0.5%
8.7%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Financial Services

SMCF
50.0%
IJS
19.8%

Energy

SMCF
18.2%
IJS
7.6%

Technology

SMCF
11.0%
IJS
11.3%

Industrials

SMCF
9.8%
IJS
11.6%

Healthcare

SMCF
4.4%
IJS
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMCF
2.6%
IJS
15.9%

Communication Services

SMCF
1.5%
IJS
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

SMCF
1.4%
IJS
3.8%

Basic Materials

SMCF
0.6%
IJS
7.1%

Real Estate

SMCF
0.5%
IJS
8.7%

Utilities

SMCF

-

IJS
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMCF vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF
SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCFIJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.99

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

13.05

-0.59

SMCF vs. IJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the IJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and IJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCFIJSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.03

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.40

+0.51

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum IJS drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and IJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCFIJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-60.11%

+31.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-9.28%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-1.22%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-9.89%

+4.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.83%

-0.18%

Volatility

SMCF vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) is 3.55%, while iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that SMCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMCFIJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

4.42%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.00%

11.52%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.18%

18.31%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.31%

21.98%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.31%

23.60%

-3.29%

SMCF vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IJS's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMCF vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than IJS's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.29%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
3.44%3.91%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMCF and IJS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJS has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCF dropped -28.48% vs IJS's -60.11%.

On 1-year performance, IJS leads with 36.88% vs 32.87% for SMCF. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IJS has performed better with a 36.88% return vs 32.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SMCF.

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.29% for IJS.

SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SMCF and 0.25% for IJS.

SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMCF and IJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer