PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCF vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMCF vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMCF vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
6.42%9.56%16.30%4.47%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%2.33%-7.41%4.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMCF achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 1.28% return.


SMCF

1D
1.46%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.42%
6M
8.57%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
1.28%
6M
3.41%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMCF vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMCF vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCF
SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCF vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMCFCALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

0.95

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

1.46

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.32

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.16

6.03

+0.13

SMCF vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMCF and CALF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCFCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

0.95

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.32

+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between SMCF and CALF is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMCF vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

SMCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than CALF's 1.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
3.68%3.91%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.43%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%

Drawdowns

SMCF vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCF drawdown since its inception was -28.48%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCF and CALF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCFCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.48%

-47.58%

+19.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.56%

-16.47%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-6.40%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-10.92%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

3.60%

+0.57%

Volatility

SMCF vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) is 4.02%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that SMCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMCFCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.25%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

11.14%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.41%

22.66%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

23.68%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

26.18%

-5.34%