SLYV vs. XSHD
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and XSHD (Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while XSHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLYV returned 8.65%/yr vs -2.42%/yr for XSHD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XSHD.
Performance
SLYV vs. XSHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than XSHD's 16.35% return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- YTD
- 21.58%
- 1Y
- 36.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
XSHD
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.28%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.13%
SLYV vs. XSHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 21.58% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 16.35% | -6.41% | -5.25% | 3.00% | -19.48% | 18.31% | -13.55% | 17.91% | -7.86% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and XSHD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SLYV and XSHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. XSHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
XSHD
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
-
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
XSHD
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
XSHD
Industrials
SLYV
XSHD
Technology
SLYV
XSHD
-
Real Estate
SLYV
XSHD
Healthcare
SLYV
XSHD
Energy
SLYV
XSHD
Basic Materials
SLYV
XSHD
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
XSHD
Communication Services
SLYV
XSHD
Utilities
SLYV
XSHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. XSHD — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
XSHD
SLYV vs. XSHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | XSHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 1.34 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 3.65 | +9.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. XSHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than XSHD's maximum drawdown of -49.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and XSHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | XSHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -49.53% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.51% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -20.77% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -34.67% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -18.97% | +18.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -16.43% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.86% | -1.05% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. XSHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 3.58%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | XSHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.58% | 5.13% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 10.41% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.87% | 15.06% | +2.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 18.82% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 22.17% | +1.73% |
SLYV vs. XSHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. XSHD - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than XSHD's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.80% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
XSHD Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.82% | 6.45% | 7.25% | 7.62% | 6.77% | 3.86% | 5.55% | 4.88% | 5.49% | 4.11% | 0.41% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and XSHD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHD has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to SLYV (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs XSHD's -49.53%.
On 5-year performance, SLYV leads with 8.65% vs -2.42% for XSHD. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 8.65% return vs -2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XSHD.
XSHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.80% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while XSHD tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.30% for XSHD.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and XSHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer