SLYV vs. USRT
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while USRT is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.25%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for USRT. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for USRT.
Performance
SLYV vs. USRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 22.30% return, which is significantly higher than USRT's 20.34% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed USRT with an annualized return of 10.25%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.14% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 1Y
- 41.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
USRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 17.86%
- YTD
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.38M | $15.69M | $22.81M | |
| $32.34M | $32.36M | $34.42M |
SLYV vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 22.30% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 20.34% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and USRT is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007 | 0.64 |
The correlation between SLYV and USRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
USRT
SLYV vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.48 | 3.17 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.47 | 10.68 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and USRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -69.92% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.04% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -18.70% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -31.03% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -44.38% | -3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.71% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -12.87% | +3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.38% | +0.33% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 3.80%, while iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 4.47% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 10.64% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 13.77% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 18.94% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.90% | 21.34% | +2.56% |
SLYV vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLYV vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than USRT's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.79% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and USRT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USRT has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to SLYV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs USRT's -69.92%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.25% vs 6.14% for USRT. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.25% return vs 6.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.
USRT has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 1.79% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USRT is REIT. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.08% for USRT.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and USRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer