SLYV vs. SMCF
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - SLYV tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index while SMCF tracks the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SLYV returned 37.01% vs 32.87% for SMCF. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SMCF.
Performance
SLYV vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than SMCF's 13.75% return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
SMCF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLYV vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 4.19% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 13.75% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and SMCF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SLYV and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. SMCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
SMCF
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SLYV
SMCF
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
SMCF
Industrials
SLYV
SMCF
Technology
SLYV
SMCF
Real Estate
SLYV
SMCF
Energy
SLYV
SMCF
Healthcare
SLYV
SMCF
Basic Materials
SLYV
SMCF
Communication Services
SLYV
SMCF
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
SMCF
Utilities
SLYV
SMCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
SMCF
SLYV vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.63 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 12.46 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.05 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.91 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than SMCF's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SMCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -28.48% | -32.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.13% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -2.44% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -5.29% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.65% | +0.18% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.55%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 3.55% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 10.00% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 16.18% | +2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 20.31% | +1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 20.31% | +3.65% |
SLYV vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SMCF's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.44% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and SMCF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SMCF's -28.48%.
On 1-year performance, SLYV leads with 37.01% vs 32.87% for SMCF. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 37.01% return vs 32.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.82% for SLYV.
SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and SMCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer