PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. SMCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than SMCF's 13.75% return.


SLYV

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.30%
YTD
15.25%
6M
14.70%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.18%

SMCF

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.63%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
15.25%6.54%7.28%4.19%
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
13.75%9.56%16.30%4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and SMCF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.85

The correlation between SLYV and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. SMCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
SMCF

Financial Services

19.8%
50.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
2.6%

Industrials

11.6%
9.8%

Technology

11.3%
11.0%

Real Estate

8.7%
0.5%

Energy

7.6%
18.2%

Healthcare

7.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

7.1%
0.6%

Communication Services

4.4%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
1.4%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Financial Services

SLYV
19.8%
SMCF
50.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.9%
SMCF
2.6%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
SMCF
9.8%

Technology

SLYV
11.3%
SMCF
11.0%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.7%
SMCF
0.5%

Energy

SLYV
7.6%
SMCF
18.2%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.5%
SMCF
4.4%

Basic Materials

SLYV
7.1%
SMCF
0.6%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
SMCF
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
SMCF
1.4%

Utilities

SLYV
2.2%
SMCF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCF
SMCF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SMCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYVSMCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

4.63

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

12.46

+0.63

SLYV vs. SMCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SMCF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and SMCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYVSMCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

2.05

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.91

-0.45

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than SMCF's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and SMCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVSMCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-28.48%

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-7.13%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-2.44%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-5.29%

-3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.65%

+0.18%

Volatility

SLYV vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.55%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVSMCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

3.55%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.00%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

16.18%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

20.31%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

20.31%

+3.65%

SLYV vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLYV vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than SMCF's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%
SMCF
Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF
3.44%3.91%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYV and SMCF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs SMCF's -28.48%.

On 1-year performance, SLYV leads with 37.01% vs 32.87% for SMCF. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 37.01% return vs 32.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for SMCF.

SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.82% for SLYV.

SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.29% for SMCF.

SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and SMCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer