SLYV vs. IQLT
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.65%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for IQLT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
SLYV vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than IQLT's 9.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLYV having a 10.65% annualized return and IQLT not far behind at 10.17%.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
IQLT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
SLYV vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 9.81% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and IQLT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SLYV and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
IQLT
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
IQLT
Technology
SLYV
IQLT
Industrials
SLYV
IQLT
Real Estate
SLYV
IQLT
Healthcare
SLYV
IQLT
Energy
SLYV
IQLT
Basic Materials
SLYV
IQLT
Communication Services
SLYV
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
IQLT
Utilities
SLYV
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
IQLT
SLYV vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 1.63 | +2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 6.18 | +7.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -32.21% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.38% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -13.18% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -30.24% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -32.21% | -15.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.04% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -6.21% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.74% | +0.08% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.81%, while iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 5.41% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 12.72% | -1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 15.00% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 16.55% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 17.00% | +6.96% |
SLYV vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than IQLT's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.12% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and IQLT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IQLT has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SLYV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.65% vs 10.17% for IQLT. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.75% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IQLT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.30% for IQLT.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer