SLYV vs. INSP
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) is Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while INSP (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SLYV returned 5.66%/yr vs -24.51%/yr for INSP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLYV vs. INSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than INSP's -56.15% return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
INSP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -26.26%
- YTD
- -56.15%
- 6M
- -69.99%
- 1Y
- -70.77%
- 3Y*
- -49.27%
- 5Y*
- -24.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYV vs. INSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.73% |
INSP Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. | -56.15% | -50.25% | -8.87% | -19.24% | 9.48% | 22.31% | 153.46% | 75.64% | 69.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and INSP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. INSP — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
INSP
SLYV vs. INSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | INSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.77 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | -0.98 | +4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | -1.58 | +14.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | INSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | -0.95 | +3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | -0.41 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.10 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. INSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum INSP drawdown of -87.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and INSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | INSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -87.72% | +26.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -72.19% | +62.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -87.72% | +59.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -87.72% | +59.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -87.60% | +86.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -27.58% | +18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 44.74% | -41.91% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. INSP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.42%, while Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (INSP) has a volatility of 18.19%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | INSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 18.19% | -13.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 48.31% | -36.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 74.63% | -56.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 60.37% | -38.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 60.61% | -36.65% |
Dividends
SLYV vs. INSP - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while INSP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSP Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and INSP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSP has higher volatility (18.19%) compared to SLYV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs INSP's -87.72%.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and INSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer