PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.


SLYV

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.12%
YTD
17.70%
6M
15.50%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
10.63%

IBIC

1D
0.06%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.49%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
17.70%6.54%7.28%11.28%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and IBIC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.01

The correlation between SLYV and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYVIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.21

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

16.41

-12.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

58.11

-44.06

SLYV vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-0.90%

-60.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-0.27%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-0.11%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-0.10%

-8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

0.08%

+2.74%

Volatility

SLYV vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

0.16%

+4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

0.67%

+11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

0.89%

+17.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

1.57%

+20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.98%

1.57%

+22.41%

SLYV vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYV vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
2.28%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYV and IBIC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, SLYV leads with 39.46% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 39.46% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYV.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.28% for SLYV.

SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer