SLYV vs. DWX
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and DWX (SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while DWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLYV returned 10.65%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for DWX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DWX.
Performance
SLYV vs. DWX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than DWX's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYV has outperformed DWX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while DWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.90% annualized return.
SLYV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 41.92%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
DWX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 16.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
SLYV vs. DWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 19.47% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
DWX SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF | 8.17% | 31.62% | 2.56% | 14.74% | -12.99% | 10.56% | -5.10% | 20.26% | -11.11% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and DWX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2008 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SLYV and DWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYV vs. DWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
DWX
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
SLYV
DWX
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
DWX
Technology
SLYV
DWX
Industrials
SLYV
DWX
Real Estate
SLYV
DWX
Healthcare
SLYV
DWX
Energy
SLYV
DWX
Basic Materials
SLYV
DWX
Communication Services
SLYV
DWX
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
DWX
Utilities
SLYV
DWX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. DWX — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
DWX
SLYV vs. DWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLYV | DWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 1.94 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.96 | 6.13 | +7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. DWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum DWX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and DWX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | DWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -66.86% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.59% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -10.65% | -18.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -26.96% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | -36.05% | -11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.37% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -14.11% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.71% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. DWX - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) at 3.01%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | DWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 3.01% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 8.88% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 11.03% | +7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 12.24% | +9.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 15.06% | +8.90% |
SLYV vs. DWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DWX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. DWX - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than DWX's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWX SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF | 4.12% | 4.44% | 4.31% | 4.12% | 4.68% | 3.89% | 3.84% | 4.40% | 5.06% | 3.85% | 5.25% | 5.81% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYV and DWX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLYV has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to DWX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs DWX's -66.86%.
On 10-year performance, SLYV leads with 10.65% vs 7.90% for DWX. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYV has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.
DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 1.75% for SLYV.
SLYV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DWX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SLYV tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.45% for DWX.
SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and DWX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer