PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYV vs. DFAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYV vs. DFAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than DFAT's 13.26% return.


SLYV

1D
-1.18%
1M
2.30%
YTD
15.25%
6M
14.70%
1Y
37.01%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
10.18%

DFAT

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.45%
YTD
13.26%
6M
13.13%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLYV vs. DFAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
15.25%6.54%7.28%14.82%-11.08%-1.82%
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
13.26%8.73%7.80%20.86%-6.23%5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYV and DFAT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.97

The correlation between SLYV and DFAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLYV vs. DFAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYV
DFAT

Financial Services

19.8%
28.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.9%
14.4%

Industrials

11.6%
15.9%

Technology

11.3%
9.2%

Real Estate

8.7%
0.9%

Energy

7.6%
11.5%

Healthcare

7.5%
6.2%

Basic Materials

7.1%
5.1%

Communication Services

4.4%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
6.7%

Utilities

2.2%
0.4%

Financial Services

SLYV
19.8%
DFAT
28.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYV
15.9%
DFAT
14.4%

Industrials

SLYV
11.6%
DFAT
15.9%

Technology

SLYV
11.3%
DFAT
9.2%

Real Estate

SLYV
8.7%
DFAT
0.9%

Energy

SLYV
7.6%
DFAT
11.5%

Healthcare

SLYV
7.5%
DFAT
6.2%

Basic Materials

SLYV
7.1%
DFAT
5.1%

Communication Services

SLYV
4.4%
DFAT
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLYV
3.8%
DFAT
6.7%

Utilities

SLYV
2.2%
DFAT
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYV vs. DFAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLYV
SLYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAT
DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLYV vs. DFAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLYVDFATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

3.16

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

10.13

+2.97

SLYV vs. DFAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the DFAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYV and DFAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLYVDFATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.81

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

SLYV vs. DFAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than DFAT's maximum drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and DFAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYVDFATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-26.12%

-35.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-9.55%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.68%

-26.12%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.75%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-6.24%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.97%

-0.14%

Volatility

SLYV vs. DFAT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) at 4.06%. This indicates that SLYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYVDFATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.06%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

10.88%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

16.75%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

21.48%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.96%

21.48%

+2.48%

SLYV vs. DFAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAT's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLYV vs. DFAT - Dividend Comparison

SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than DFAT's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
1.45%1.55%1.31%1.34%1.34%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLYV
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.02%2.30%2.11%1.47%1.94%1.40%1.67%2.14%5.53%2.18%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SLYV and DFAT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLYV has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to DFAT (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs DFAT's -26.12%.

On 3-year performance, DFAT leads with 16.49% vs 14.08% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAT has performed better with a 16.49% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DFAT.

SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.45% for DFAT.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.28% for DFAT.

SLYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYV and DFAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer