DFAT vs. DFUVX
DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and DFUVX (DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio) are both funds - DFAT is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFUVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 5 years, DFAT returned 10.54%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for DFUVX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for DFUVX.
Performance
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DFAT having a 15.54% return and DFUVX slightly higher at 15.75%.
DFAT
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 15.54%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- —
DFUVX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 31.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 15.54% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 20.86% | -6.23% | 3.66% |
DFUVX DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio | 15.75% | 15.83% | 12.87% | 11.65% | -5.73% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAT and DFUVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DFAT and DFUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAT vs. DFUVX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAT
DFUVX
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAT | DFUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 5.60 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 20.28 | -9.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum DFUVX drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and DFUVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAT | DFUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -65.60% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -5.85% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -17.04% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.12% | -20.33% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -1.28% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -9.83% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.61% | +1.36% |
Volatility
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAT | DFUVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.78% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 8.46% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 11.35% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 15.95% | +5.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 18.41% | +3.03% |
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUVX's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAT vs. DFUVX - Dividend Comparison
DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than DFUVX's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFUVX DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio | 1.51% | 1.31% | 1.94% | 5.68% | 5.84% | 1.77% | 2.09% | 5.04% | 9.79% | 7.99% | 4.90% | 8.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAT and DFUVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAT has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to DFUVX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs DFUVX's -65.60%.
DFUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAT and DFUVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer