PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAT vs. DFUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAT having a 19.60% return and DFUVX slightly lower at 18.91%.


DFAT

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.65%
6M
12.28%
YTD
19.60%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.22%

DFUVX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.91%
6M
13.54%
YTD
18.91%
1Y
33.06%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$27.35M$25.25M$22.69M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
19.60%8.73%7.80%20.86%-6.23%3.66%
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
18.91%15.83%12.87%11.65%-5.73%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAT and DFUVX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.90

The correlation between DFAT and DFUVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAT vs. DFUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFAT
DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUVX
DFUVX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DFUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFATDFUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

5.24

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

19.90

-8.55

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the DFUVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAT and DFUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum DFUVX drawdown of -65.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and DFUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFATDFUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-65.60%

+39.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-5.85%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.12%

-17.04%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-20.33%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.70%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-9.79%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.57%

+1.26%

Volatility

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio (DFUVX) at 2.55%. This indicates that DFAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFATDFUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

2.55%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

8.21%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

11.26%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

15.83%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.26%

18.31%

+2.95%

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUVX's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAT vs. DFUVX - Dividend Comparison

DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than DFUVX's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAT
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF
1.36%1.55%1.31%1.34%1.34%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFUVX
DFA U.S. Large Cap Value III Portfolio
1.48%1.31%1.94%5.68%5.84%1.77%2.09%5.04%9.79%7.99%4.90%8.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAT and DFUVX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAT has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to DFUVX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs DFUVX's -65.60%.

DFUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAT and DFUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer