SLYV vs. BSVO
SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. SLYV is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLYV returned 14.08%/yr vs 18.56%/yr for BSVO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SLYV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
SLYV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.
SLYV
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
BSVO
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 18.09%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLYV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 15.25% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.77% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 18.09% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYV and BSVO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SLYV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SLYV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYV
BSVO
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SLYV
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
SLYV
BSVO
Industrials
SLYV
BSVO
Technology
SLYV
BSVO
Real Estate
SLYV
BSVO
Energy
SLYV
BSVO
Healthcare
SLYV
BSVO
Basic Materials
SLYV
BSVO
Communication Services
SLYV
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
SLYV
BSVO
Utilities
SLYV
BSVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
SLYV
BSVO
SLYV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 4.99 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 14.22 | -1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.21 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.78 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
SLYV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYV drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYV and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -28.67% | -32.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.31% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.68% | -28.67% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.86% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -5.73% | -3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.91% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SLYV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is 4.42%, while EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that SLYV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.77% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 11.95% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 18.88% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 21.72% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 21.72% | +2.24% |
SLYV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
SLYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than BSVO's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SLYV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BSVO has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to SLYV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYV dropped -61.15% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 18.56% vs 14.08% for SLYV. On fees, SLYV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYV has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 18.56% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
SLYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.29% for BSVO.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYV and 0.47% for BSVO.
BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYV and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer