PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLYG vs. SPYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLYG vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 17.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SLYG has outperformed SPYD with an annualized return of 11.12%, while SPYD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.80% annualized return.


SLYG

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.05%
6M
17.84%
YTD
25.05%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.51%

SPYD

1D
0.67%
1M
2.91%
6M
12.53%
YTD
17.73%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
14.57%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
8.80%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.04M$11.74M$13.56M
$49.71M$46.69M$54.64M

SLYG vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
25.05%5.20%9.38%17.27%-21.26%22.42%19.48%20.97%-4.20%14.62%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
17.73%4.65%15.34%3.91%-1.17%32.73%-11.64%21.20%-4.89%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SLYG and SPYD is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2015

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SLYG and SPYD has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SLYG vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLYG
SPYD

Industrials

19.0%
2.5%

Technology

17.7%
2.7%

Healthcare

17.2%
5.4%

Financial Services

13.9%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
6.4%

Real Estate

6.8%
26.5%

Energy

3.8%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
14.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.6%

Utilities

1.6%
11.6%

Industrials

SLYG
19.0%
SPYD
2.5%

Technology

SLYG
17.7%
SPYD
2.7%

Healthcare

SLYG
17.2%
SPYD
5.4%

Financial Services

SLYG
13.9%
SPYD
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SLYG
11.1%
SPYD
6.4%

Real Estate

SLYG
6.8%
SPYD
26.5%

Energy

SLYG
3.8%
SPYD
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

SLYG
3.3%
SPYD
14.6%

Basic Materials

SLYG
3.1%
SPYD
3.7%

Communication Services

SLYG
2.7%
SPYD
4.6%

Utilities

SLYG
1.6%
SPYD
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLYG vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLYG
SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYD
SPYD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYD Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLYG vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLYGSPYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.26

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

9.67

+3.42

SLYG vs. SPYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SPYD Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLYG and SPYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLYG vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than SPYD's maximum drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and SPYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLYGSPYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-46.42%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-7.05%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-16.13%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-22.25%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.86%

-46.42%

+4.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-1.40%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-6.09%

-8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.37%

+0.30%

Volatility

SLYG vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 3.94%. This indicates that SLYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLYGSPYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.94%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

8.39%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.81%

11.88%

+5.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

15.98%

+5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

19.77%

+2.96%

SLYG vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLYG vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison

SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SPYD's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLYG
SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
0.65%0.86%1.22%1.18%1.18%0.68%0.71%1.08%1.06%4.74%1.13%5.75%
SPYD
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF
4.08%4.52%4.31%4.66%5.01%3.68%4.95%4.42%4.75%4.63%4.34%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLYG and SPYD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLYG has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to SPYD (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.92% vs SPYD's -46.42%.

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.12% vs 8.80% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.

SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.65% for SLYG.

SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SPYD is S&P 500. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.07% for SPYD.

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLYG and SPYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer