SLYG vs. OILK
SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLYG returned 5.49%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLYG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
SLYG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLYG achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
SLYG
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 15.50%
- 6M
- 13.61%
- 1Y
- 26.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.83%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SLYG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 15.50% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLYG and OILK is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SLYG and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLYG vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLYG
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SLYG
OILK
-
Industrials
SLYG
OILK
-
Healthcare
SLYG
OILK
-
Financial Services
SLYG
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
SLYG
OILK
Real Estate
SLYG
OILK
-
Energy
SLYG
OILK
-
Communication Services
SLYG
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
SLYG
OILK
-
Basic Materials
SLYG
OILK
-
Utilities
SLYG
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLYG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
SLYG
OILK
SLYG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.34 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.42 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 6.91 | +3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 2.06 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.59 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.12 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
SLYG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLYG drawdown since its inception was -62.15%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLYG and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.15% | -83.76% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -17.35% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -23.42% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.18% | -34.69% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -3.66% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -32.61% | +18.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 8.56% | -5.96% |
Volatility
SLYG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) is 4.59%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that SLYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 10.44% | -5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 23.26% | -10.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.57% | 28.75% | -11.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 30.12% | -8.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 35.97% | -13.23% |
SLYG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLYG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLYG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
SLYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLYG and OILK have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to SLYG (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLYG dropped -62.15% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 5.49% for SLYG. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.71% for SLYG.
SLYG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SLYG and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLYG and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer