PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLX vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLX vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 19.73%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return.


SLX

1D
-1.15%
1M
9.68%
YTD
32.29%
6M
36.55%
1Y
77.34%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
16.14%
10Y*
19.73%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLX vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
32.29%47.45%-17.94%31.25%14.28%27.69%20.57%12.01%-19.27%24.59%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SLX and GDX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2006

0.39

The correlation between SLX and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (10 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLX vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLX
GDX

Basic Materials

95.0%
100.0%

Energy

3.5%

-

Industrials

1.4%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLX
95.0%
GDX
100.0%

Energy

SLX
3.5%
GDX

-

Industrials

SLX
1.4%
GDX

-

Communication Services

SLX

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLX

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

SLX

-

GDX

-

Financial Services

SLX

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

SLX

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

SLX

-

GDX

-

Technology

SLX

-

GDX

-

Utilities

SLX

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLX vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLX
SLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLX vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLXGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.25

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

2.00

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

5.13

+11.50

SLX vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLX and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLXGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

1.35

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.38

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.13

+0.09

Drawdowns

SLX vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, roughly equal to the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLXGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.14%

-80.34%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.35%

-30.84%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-30.84%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.62%

-46.51%

+12.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.64%

-49.79%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-26.62%

+25.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.73%

-40.43%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

11.99%

-7.32%

Volatility

SLX vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) is 7.87%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that SLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLXGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

15.40%

-7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

37.50%

-19.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.92%

45.49%

-21.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.72%

36.39%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.02%

37.18%

-6.16%

SLX vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLX vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
1.17%1.55%3.56%2.80%4.97%7.07%1.87%3.44%6.26%2.50%1.06%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLX and GDX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to SLX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 13.98% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, SLX has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for SLX.

SLX has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

SLX is categorized as Materials, while GDX is Gold. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.51% for GDX.

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLX and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer