PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLX vs. DBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLX vs. DBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than DBA's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed DBA with an annualized return of 19.73%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.


SLX

1D
-1.15%
1M
9.68%
YTD
32.29%
6M
36.55%
1Y
77.34%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
16.14%
10Y*
19.73%

DBA

1D
-0.96%
1M
-5.05%
YTD
5.25%
6M
5.49%
1Y
4.23%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLX vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
32.29%47.45%-17.94%31.25%14.28%27.69%20.57%12.01%-19.27%24.59%
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
5.25%-0.56%33.45%7.64%2.53%22.37%-2.54%-0.71%-8.74%-6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SLX and DBA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.29

The correlation between SLX and DBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLX vs. DBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLX
DBA

Basic Materials

95.0%
10.7%

Energy

3.5%
5.3%

Industrials

1.4%
15.2%

Communication Services

-

7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Financial Services

-

13.7%

Healthcare

-

16.8%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

6.3%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Basic Materials

SLX
95.0%
DBA
10.7%

Energy

SLX
3.5%
DBA
5.3%

Industrials

SLX
1.4%
DBA
15.2%

Communication Services

SLX

-

DBA
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SLX

-

DBA
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

SLX

-

DBA
8.8%

Financial Services

SLX

-

DBA
13.7%

Healthcare

SLX

-

DBA
16.8%

Real Estate

SLX

-

DBA
1.1%

Technology

SLX

-

DBA
6.3%

Utilities

SLX

-

DBA
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLX vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLX
SLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DBA
DBA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBA Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLX vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLXDBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.07

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

0.53

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

1.04

+15.59

SLX vs. DBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLX Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the DBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLX and DBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLXDBADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

0.39

+2.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.71

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.27

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.08

+0.14

Drawdowns

SLX vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and DBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLXDBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.14%

-67.97%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.35%

-7.99%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.39%

-12.36%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.62%

-15.94%

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.64%

-41.16%

-20.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-25.90%

+24.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.73%

-41.11%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

4.07%

+0.60%

Volatility

SLX vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.17%. This indicates that SLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLXDBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

4.17%

+3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.92%

6.46%

+11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.92%

10.77%

+13.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.72%

14.10%

+13.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.02%

13.09%

+17.93%

SLX vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLX vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison

SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than DBA's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBA
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund
3.40%3.58%4.08%4.63%0.48%0.00%0.00%1.55%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLX
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF
1.17%1.55%3.56%2.80%4.97%7.07%1.87%3.44%6.26%2.50%1.06%5.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLX and DBA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to DBA (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs DBA's -67.97%.

On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 3.54% for DBA. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DBA.

DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.17% for SLX.

SLX is categorized as Materials, while DBA is Agricultural Commodities. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.94% for DBA.

SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLX and DBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer