SLX vs. DBA
SLX (VanEck Vectors Steel ETF) and DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SLX is a Materials fund tracking the NYSE Arca Steel Index, while DBA is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLX returned 19.73%/yr vs 3.54%/yr for DBA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for DBA.
Performance
SLX vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLX achieves a 32.29% return, which is significantly higher than DBA's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SLX has outperformed DBA with an annualized return of 19.73%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.54% annualized return.
SLX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- 32.29%
- 6M
- 36.55%
- 1Y
- 77.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.14%
- 10Y*
- 19.73%
DBA
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
SLX vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 32.29% | 47.45% | -17.94% | 31.25% | 14.28% | 27.69% | 20.57% | 12.01% | -19.27% | 24.59% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 5.25% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLX and DBA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.29 |
The correlation between SLX and DBA shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLX vs. DBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLX
DBA
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLX
DBA
Energy
SLX
DBA
Industrials
SLX
DBA
Communication Services
SLX
-
DBA
Consumer Cyclical
SLX
-
DBA
Consumer Defensive
SLX
-
DBA
Financial Services
SLX
-
DBA
Healthcare
SLX
-
DBA
Real Estate
SLX
-
DBA
Technology
SLX
-
DBA
Utilities
SLX
-
DBA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLX vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank
SLX
DBA
SLX vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLX | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.07 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.76 | 0.53 | +4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.63 | 1.04 | +15.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLX | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.25 | 0.39 | +2.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.27 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.08 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
SLX vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLX drawdown since its inception was -82.14%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLX and DBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLX | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.14% | -67.97% | -14.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.35% | -7.99% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.39% | -12.36% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.62% | -15.94% | -17.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.64% | -41.16% | -20.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -25.90% | +24.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.73% | -41.11% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 4.07% | +0.60% |
Volatility
SLX vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Steel ETF (SLX) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.17%. This indicates that SLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLX | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 4.17% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 6.46% | +11.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.92% | 10.77% | +13.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 14.10% | +13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 13.09% | +17.93% |
SLX vs. DBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DBA's 0.94% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLX vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
SLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than DBA's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.40% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLX VanEck Vectors Steel ETF | 1.17% | 1.55% | 3.56% | 2.80% | 4.97% | 7.07% | 1.87% | 3.44% | 6.26% | 2.50% | 1.06% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLX and DBA have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to DBA (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLX dropped -82.14% vs DBA's -67.97%.
On 10-year performance, SLX leads with 19.73% vs 3.54% for DBA. On fees, SLX is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DBA has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLX has performed better with a 19.73% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SLX is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for DBA.
DBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.17% for SLX.
SLX is categorized as Materials, while DBA is Agricultural Commodities. SLX tracks NYSE Arca Steel Index, while DBA tracks DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for SLX and 0.94% for DBA.
SLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLX and DBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer