DBA vs. TAGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS).
DBA and TAGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. TAGS is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium TAGS Index. It was launched on Mar 28, 2012. Both DBA and TAGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBA or TAGS.
Correlation
The correlation between DBA and TAGS is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
DBA vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DBA:
0.79
TAGS:
-0.76
DBA:
1.18
TAGS:
-1.02
DBA:
1.15
TAGS:
0.89
DBA:
0.33
TAGS:
-0.15
DBA:
2.88
TAGS:
-0.92
DBA:
4.68%
TAGS:
10.71%
DBA:
16.80%
TAGS:
12.88%
DBA:
-67.97%
TAGS:
-76.40%
DBA:
-28.49%
TAGS:
-62.78%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly higher than TAGS's -0.75% return. Over the past 10 years, DBA has outperformed TAGS with an annualized return of 3.13%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.80% annualized return.
DBA
1.02%
-0.44%
10.42%
16.64%
16.57%
3.13%
TAGS
-0.75%
-1.85%
-3.60%
-11.81%
8.82%
-1.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBA vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBA has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBA vs. TAGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
DBA
TAGS
DBA vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DBA vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
DBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 4.04% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DBA vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and TAGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DBA vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) at 3.55%. This indicates that DBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.