DBA vs. BCD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD).
DBA and BCD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index TR. It was launched on Jan 5, 2007. BCD is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DBA or BCD.
Correlation
The correlation between DBA and BCD is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DBA vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DBA:
1.91
BCD:
0.27
DBA:
2.54
BCD:
0.45
DBA:
1.33
BCD:
1.05
DBA:
0.68
BCD:
0.13
DBA:
5.83
BCD:
0.60
DBA:
5.55%
BCD:
4.86%
DBA:
16.99%
BCD:
10.86%
DBA:
-67.97%
BCD:
-29.79%
DBA:
-28.82%
BCD:
-17.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBA achieves a 34.19% return, which is significantly higher than BCD's 3.53% return.
DBA
34.19%
6.71%
10.04%
32.08%
12.36%
1.67%
BCD
3.53%
-1.22%
-3.74%
2.23%
9.63%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBA vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBA has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DBA vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DBA vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBA nor BCD has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 0.00% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 0.00% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
DBA vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBA drawdown since its inception was -67.97%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBA and BCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DBA vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.