QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO).
QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQCL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 10, 2023. QMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Oct 25, 2023.
Performance
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | -4.67% | 13.10% | 41.38% | 9.41% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | -15.25% | 16.57% | 37.65% | 16.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQCL.TO achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's -15.25% return.
QQCL.TO
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 17.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -15.25%
- 6M
- -14.61%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQCL.TO
QMAX.TO
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQCL.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.46 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 0.54 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 1.52 | +3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQCL.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.46 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%, more than QMAX.TO's 11.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF | 14.48% | 14.54% | 11.87% | 3.68% |
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 11.87% | 10.79% | 10.90% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.63%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAX.TO drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQCL.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.63% | -26.77% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.21% | -22.86% | +6.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.32% | -20.12% | +11.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -5.29% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 8.16% | -4.12% |
Volatility
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) is 6.86%, while Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that QQCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQCL.TO | QMAX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 7.64% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 16.03% | -3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 26.26% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 23.56% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 23.56% | -2.95% |