PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
-4.67%13.10%41.38%9.41%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
-15.25%16.57%37.65%16.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCL.TO achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly higher than QMAX.TO's -15.25% return.


QQCL.TO

1D
2.65%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-2.53%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QMAX.TO

1D
3.55%
1M
-2.67%
YTD
-15.25%
6M
-14.61%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCL.TO
QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQCL.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.46

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

0.83

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.54

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

1.52

+3.10

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQCL.TOQMAX.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.46

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.88

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%, more than QMAX.TO's 11.87% yield.


TTM202520242023
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
14.48%14.54%11.87%3.68%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
11.87%10.79%10.90%2.01%

Drawdowns

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.63%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAX.TO drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and QMAX.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQCL.TOQMAX.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.63%

-26.77%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.21%

-22.86%

+6.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.32%

-20.12%

+11.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-5.29%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

8.16%

-4.12%

Volatility

QQCL.TO vs. QMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) is 6.86%, while Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that QQCL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQCL.TOQMAX.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

7.64%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

16.03%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.34%

26.26%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

23.56%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.61%

23.56%

-2.95%