PortfoliosLab logo
QQCL.TO vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQCL.TO and QYLD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQCL.TO:

0.58

QYLD:

0.30

Sortino Ratio

QQCL.TO:

0.93

QYLD:

0.57

Omega Ratio

QQCL.TO:

1.13

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

QQCL.TO:

0.56

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

QQCL.TO:

1.86

QYLD:

1.03

Ulcer Index

QQCL.TO:

7.78%

QYLD:

5.57%

Daily Std Dev

QQCL.TO:

27.00%

QYLD:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

QQCL.TO:

-25.63%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

QQCL.TO:

-9.96%

QYLD:

-9.73%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQCL.TO having a -5.73% return and QYLD slightly higher at -5.65%.


QQCL.TO

YTD

-5.73%

1M

7.57%

6M

-2.35%

1Y

15.57%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

-5.65%

1M

1.38%

6M

-3.65%

1Y

5.77%

3Y*

9.42%

5Y*

7.90%

10Y*

7.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQCL.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQCL.TO is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQCL.TO is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQCL.TO is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQCL.TO is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQCL.TO is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQCL.TO is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCL.TO and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.94%, more than QYLD's 13.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QQCL.TO
Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF
13.94%11.87%3.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.79%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.63%, roughly equal to the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and QYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that QQCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...