QQCL.TO vs. QYLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QQCL.TO (Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Global X. QQCL.TO is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, QQCL.TO returned 28.37% vs 22.00% for QYLD. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQCL.TO charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

QQCL.TO is traded in CAD, while QYLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QYLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQCL.TO achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 10.16% return.

QQCL.TO

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -5.74%
• 6M: 13.14%
• YTD: 14.15%
• 1Y: 28.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.10%

QYLD

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -2.41%
• 6M: 9.95%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 1Y: 22.00%
• 3Y*: 14.60%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 10.31%
• ALL TIME*: 11.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	CA$1.23M	CA$1.27M	CA$1.40M
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	CA$117.23M	CA$110.96M	CA$137.20M

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	14.15%	13.10%	41.38%	4.96%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	10.16%	4.29%	29.46%	1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QQCL.TO and QYLD is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023	0.64

The correlation between QQCL.TO and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQCL.TO	QYLD
Technology	58.6%	61.4%
Communication Services	14.3%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	6.7%
Healthcare	3.7%	3.8%
Industrials	2.6%	4.4%
Utilities	1.2%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.1%
Energy	0.5%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQCL.TO

QQCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 56
QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
QQCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QQCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 83
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQCL.TO	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.79	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	2.62	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	3.35	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.36	14.15	-6.80

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQCL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQCL.TO and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.63%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -21.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQCL.TO and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQCL.TO	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.63%	-21.80%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.29%	-6.31%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.07%	-4.16%	-3.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-4.08%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	1.49%	+1.98%

Volatility

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCL.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.67% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.05%. This indicates that QQCL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQCL.TO	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.67%	5.05%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.69%	10.55%	+6.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.59%	11.81%	+7.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	16.27%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	17.04%	+4.01%

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQCL.TO has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQCL.TO vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

QQCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.39%, more than QYLD's 11.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQCL.TO Global X Enhanced NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF	14.39%	14.54%	11.87%	3.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.89%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQCL.TO and QYLD in my portfolio?

QQCL.TO and QYLD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQCL.TO or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQCL.TO or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QQCL.TO.

What is the main difference between QQCL.TO and QYLD?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QQCL.TO and 0.60% for QYLD.