PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLVU.TO (BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVU.TO is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Silver Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index ER, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO returned 7.42%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVU.TO charges 2.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for QQCC.TO.

Performance

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVU.TO achieves a -32.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVU.TO has underperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 7.42%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.87% annualized return.

SLVU.TO

1D
-5.36%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-32.84%
6M
-7.57%
1Y
133.37%
3Y*
49.77%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
7.42%

QQCC.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
10.18%
YTD
16.94%
6M
14.76%
1Y
35.05%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLVU.TO
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF		-32.84%349.11%20.71%-16.01%-10.21%-34.59%55.46%16.28%-26.54%1.00%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		16.94%11.64%33.48%35.99%-8.51%7.92%-3.26%16.18%-15.89%18.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVU.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2011

0.17

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SLVU.TO
QQCC.TO

Real Estate

26.4%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.6%

Energy

-

0.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Technology

-

50.5%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Real Estate

SLVU.TO
26.4%
QQCC.TO
0.1%

Basic Materials

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
1.3%

Communication Services

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
8.6%

Energy

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
0.7%

Financial Services

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
0.2%

Healthcare

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
5.1%

Industrials

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
3.3%

Technology

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
50.5%

Utilities

SLVU.TO

-

QQCC.TO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with SLVU.TO:
SLVU.TO vs. GDXUSLVU.TO vs. CNDU.TOSLVU.TO vs. LGD.TOSLVU.TO vs. HXD.TOSLVU.TO vs. CPXRSLVU.TO vs. QQCL.TOSLVU.TO vs. MNS.TO
Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO

Return for Risk

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SLVU.TO
SLVU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SLVU.TOQQCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.14
2.76

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
3.72

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.50

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.32

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

16.04

-12.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVU.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SLVU.TOQQCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.76

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.90

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.63

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.00

-0.01

Drawdowns

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVU.TO drawdown since its inception was -98.60%, which is greater than QQCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVU.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SLVU.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.60%

-36.70%

-61.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.62%

-8.15%

-68.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.62%

-22.24%

-54.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.62%

-22.24%

-54.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.27%

-36.70%

-43.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.63%

0.00%

-90.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.56%

-8.37%

-74.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.19%

2.19%

+38.00%

Volatility

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF (SLVU.TO) has a higher volatility of 34.08% compared to Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that SLVU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SLVU.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.08%

3.75%

+30.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

132.13%

10.03%

+122.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

118.13%

12.78%

+105.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.80%

17.58%

+56.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.52%

17.29%

+48.23%

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVU.TO has a 2.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVU.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLVU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		10.48%11.27%9.89%11.85%11.04%5.15%5.84%6.31%7.90%6.01%6.73%8.89%
SLVU.TO
BetaPro Silver 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SLVU.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQCC.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQCC.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.20% for SLVU.TO.

SLVU.TO is categorized as Silver, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 2.20% for SLVU.TO and 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLVU.TO and QQCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer