SLVP vs. XTL
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 13.10%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for XTL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
SLVP vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has underperformed XTL with an annualized return of 13.10%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 6.68%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 93.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
XTL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 120.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
SLVP vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 0.95% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.46% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and XTL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.24 |
The correlation between SLVP and XTL shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLVP vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLVP
XTL
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SLVP
XTL
-
Financial Services
SLVP
XTL
-
Communication Services
SLVP
-
XTL
Consumer Cyclical
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Energy
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Industrials
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
SLVP
-
XTL
Technology
SLVP
-
XTL
Utilities
SLVP
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
XTL
SLVP vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.58 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 8.26 | -5.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 34.62 | -28.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -37.01% | -43.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -14.70% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -22.79% | -15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.79% | -37.01% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -37.01% | -25.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.18% | -6.61% | -20.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.77% | -9.76% | -37.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 3.50% | +10.91% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 20.77% compared to SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) at 11.24%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.77% | 11.24% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.32% | 24.21% | +21.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.01% | 30.10% | +24.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 25.35% | +17.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.48% | 23.67% | +18.81% |
SLVP vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than XTL's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and XTL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (20.77%) compared to XTL (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.10% vs 13.10% for SLVP. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while XTL is Communications Equities. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer