SLVP vs. UIVM
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLVP returned 14.15%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for UIVM. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UIVM.
Performance
SLVP vs. UIVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than UIVM's 15.12% return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -18.46%
- YTD
- -5.37%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 81.81%
- 3Y*
- 48.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
UIVM
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 33.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP vs. UIVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -5.37% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 1.68% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 15.12% | 45.47% | 5.23% | 16.79% | -13.31% | 11.85% | 0.76% | 15.29% | -17.41% | 2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and UIVM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SLVP and UIVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SLVP vs. UIVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SLVP
UIVM
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SLVP
UIVM
Communication Services
SLVP
-
UIVM
Consumer Cyclical
SLVP
-
UIVM
Consumer Defensive
SLVP
-
UIVM
Energy
SLVP
-
UIVM
Financial Services
SLVP
-
UIVM
Healthcare
SLVP
-
UIVM
Industrials
SLVP
-
UIVM
Real Estate
SLVP
-
UIVM
Technology
SLVP
-
UIVM
Utilities
SLVP
-
UIVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. UIVM — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
UIVM
SLVP vs. UIVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.95 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 10.70 | -4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. UIVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than UIVM's maximum drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and UIVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -42.73% | -37.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -11.02% | -27.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -11.69% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.17% | -28.27% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.74% | -0.74% | -31.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -9.68% | -37.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.31% | 3.03% | +11.28% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. UIVM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) at 6.01%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.61% | 6.01% | +13.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.17% | 13.25% | +31.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.53% | 15.25% | +39.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.15% | 15.57% | +27.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 17.25% | +25.20% |
SLVP vs. UIVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UIVM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. UIVM - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than UIVM's 3.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 1.88% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.02% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and UIVM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to UIVM (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs UIVM's -42.73%.
On 5-year performance, SLVP leads with 14.15% vs 11.89% for UIVM. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 1.88% for SLVP.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while UIVM is Momentum. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.35% for UIVM.
UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and UIVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer