SLVP vs. ICSH
SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. SLVP is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLVP returned 13.10%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
SLVP vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SLVP has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 13.10%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.79% annualized return.
SLVP
- 1D
- 6.68%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 93.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.67%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.79%
SLVP vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 0.95% | 202.84% | 14.47% | -2.31% | -18.06% | -23.53% | 56.45% | 37.71% | -22.10% | 4.53% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.57% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLVP and ICSH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.09 |
The correlation between SLVP and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLVP vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
SLVP
ICSH
SLVP vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLVP | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 6.64 | -5.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 44.30 | -41.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 292.98 | -286.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLVP vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLVP | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.47% | -3.94% | -76.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.06% | -0.10% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.06% | -0.10% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.79% | -0.73% | -49.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -3.94% | -58.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.18% | 0.00% | -27.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.77% | -0.08% | -46.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 0.01% | +14.40% |
Volatility
SLVP vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a higher volatility of 20.77% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.13%. This indicates that SLVP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLVP | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.77% | 0.13% | +20.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.32% | 0.30% | +45.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.01% | 0.40% | +54.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 0.48% | +42.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.48% | 1.06% | +41.42% |
SLVP vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLVP vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than ICSH's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.33% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.17% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLVP and ICSH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLVP has higher volatility (20.77%) compared to ICSH (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, SLVP leads with 13.10% vs 2.79% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 13.10% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SLVP.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 2.17% for SLVP.
SLVP is categorized as Silver, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.08 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLVP and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer