ICSH vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
ICSH and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ICSH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Dec 11, 2013. PULS is an actively managed fund by Prudential. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ICSH or PULS.
Correlation
The correlation between ICSH and PULS is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ICSH vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ICSH:
13.48
PULS:
12.34
ICSH:
35.47
PULS:
29.52
ICSH:
8.69
PULS:
8.03
ICSH:
67.20
PULS:
59.13
ICSH:
491.52
PULS:
375.01
ICSH:
0.01%
PULS:
0.02%
ICSH:
0.41%
PULS:
0.48%
ICSH:
-3.94%
PULS:
-5.85%
ICSH:
0.00%
PULS:
0.00%
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with ICSH at 0.77% and PULS at 0.77%.
ICSH
0.77%
0.47%
2.45%
5.59%
2.82%
2.50%
PULS
0.77%
0.46%
2.75%
5.93%
3.23%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ICSH vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ICSH vs. PULS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ICSH
PULS
ICSH vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ICSH vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than PULS's 5.50% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | 5.16% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.22% | 2.60% | 2.19% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% | 0.46% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.50% | 5.63% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.92% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ICSH vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ICSH vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) have volatilities of 0.11% and 0.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.