PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ICSH vs. FLDR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ICSHFLDR
YTD Return4.60%4.86%
1Y Return6.10%7.11%
3Y Return (Ann)3.69%3.61%
5Y Return (Ann)2.66%2.59%
Sharpe Ratio14.306.76
Sortino Ratio42.1013.95
Omega Ratio9.892.82
Calmar Ratio88.7926.66
Martin Ratio615.32111.28
Ulcer Index0.01%0.06%
Daily Std Dev0.43%1.06%
Max Drawdown-3.94%-12.23%
Current Drawdown0.00%-0.14%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ICSH and FLDR is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ICSH vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ICSH achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLDR's 4.86% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
3.02%
3.34%
ICSH
FLDR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ICSH vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICSH has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
Expense ratio chart for FLDR: current value at 0.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.15%
Expense ratio chart for ICSH: current value at 0.08% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.08%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ICSH vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ICSH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ICSH, currently valued at 14.18, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.0014.18
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ICSH, currently valued at 41.68, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0041.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ICSH, currently valued at 9.80, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.009.80
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ICSH, currently valued at 87.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0087.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ICSH, currently valued at 608.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00608.99
FLDR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLDR, currently valued at 6.76, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.006.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLDR, currently valued at 13.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0013.95
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FLDR, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.002.82
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLDR, currently valued at 26.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0026.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FLDR, currently valued at 111.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00111.28

ICSH vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICSH Sharpe Ratio is 14.30, which is higher than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 6.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICSH and FLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio4.006.008.0010.0012.0014.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
14.18
6.76
ICSH
FLDR

Dividends

ICSH vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, less than FLDR's 5.60% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
5.29%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%0.46%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
5.60%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ICSH vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICSH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum FLDR drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICSH and FLDR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.25%-0.20%-0.15%-0.10%-0.05%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober0
-0.14%
ICSH
FLDR

Volatility

ICSH vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ICSH) is 0.10%, while Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) has a volatility of 0.27%. This indicates that ICSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.15%0.20%0.25%0.30%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
0.10%
0.27%
ICSH
FLDR