SLVP vs. GDXU

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) and GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) are both exchange-traded funds - SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while GDXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLVP returned 14.15%/yr vs -14.73%/yr for GDXU. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SLVP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXU.

Performance

SLVP vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLVP achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.

SLVP

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -21.72%
• YTD: -5.37%
• 6M: -0.60%
• 1Y: 83.53%
• 3Y*: 48.97%
• 5Y*: 14.15%
• 10Y*: 12.67%

GDXU

• 1D: 8.84%
• 1M: -50.11%
• YTD: -56.00%
• 6M: -55.92%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 37.87%
• 5Y*: -14.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLVP vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	-5.37%	202.84%	14.47%	-2.31%	-18.06%	-23.53%	10.65%
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040	-56.00%	796.47%	-18.60%	-21.36%	-62.82%	-54.93%	4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SLVP and GDXU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020	0.93

The correlation between SLVP and GDXU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SLVP vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SLVP	GDXU
Basic Materials	100.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SLVP vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLVP

SLVP Risk / Return Rank: 46
SLVP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SLVP Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SLVP Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SLVP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SLVP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

GDXU

GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 19
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLVP vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLVP	GDXU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.22	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	1.27	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.18	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	0.37	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.86	0.80	+5.05

SLVP vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLVP Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLVP and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SLVP vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLVP drawdown since its inception was -80.47%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLVP and GDXU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLVP	GDXU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.47%	-94.39%	+13.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.06%	-83.97%	+45.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.06%	-83.97%	+45.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.26%	-92.44%	+38.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.74%	-79.58%	+47.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.78%	-69.77%	+22.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.31%	38.59%	-24.28%

Volatility

SLVP vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is 19.61%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that SLVP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLVP	GDXU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.61%	54.28%	-34.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.17%	123.72%	-78.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.53%	142.00%	-87.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.15%	111.92%	-68.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.45%	110.82%	-68.37%

SLVP vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLVP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLVP vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF	1.88%	1.78%	1.05%	0.88%	0.63%	1.63%	2.39%	2.03%	1.28%	0.85%	2.32%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLVP and GDXU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SLVP and GDXU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SLVP or GDXU?

GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to SLVP (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLVP dropped -80.47% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

Which ETF is better, SLVP or GDXU?

On 5-year performance, SLVP leads with 14.15% vs -14.73% for GDXU. On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SLVP has been the lower-risk option at 19.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SLVP or GDXU?

Over the 5-year period, SLVP has performed better with a 14.15% return vs -14.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLVP or GDXU?

SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLVP or GDXU?

SLVP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

What is the main difference between SLVP and GDXU?

SLVP is categorized as Silver, while GDXU is Leveraged Equities. SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index, while GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SLVP and 0.95% for GDXU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLVP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.