PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. XOVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than XOVR's -0.89% return.


SLV

1D
0.77%
1M
-22.76%
YTD
-4.86%
6M
9.25%
1Y
85.39%
3Y*
41.27%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
13.99%

XOVR

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.78%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
0.05%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-4.86%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%-0.12%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
-0.89%11.83%33.21%51.89%-41.09%-7.24%50.39%31.72%-5.02%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and XOVR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017

0.19

SLV vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLV
XOVR

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

26.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

8.5%

Healthcare

-

18.4%

Industrials

-

5.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

34.1%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLV
100.0%
XOVR

-

Communication Services

SLV

-

XOVR
26.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SLV

-

XOVR
6.9%

Consumer Defensive

SLV

-

XOVR

-

Energy

SLV

-

XOVR
3.1%

Financial Services

SLV

-

XOVR
8.5%

Healthcare

SLV

-

XOVR
18.4%

Industrials

SLV

-

XOVR
5.4%

Real Estate

SLV

-

XOVR

-

Technology

SLV

-

XOVR
34.1%

Utilities

SLV

-

XOVR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XOVR
XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLVXOVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.09

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

0.37

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

0.81

+3.29

SLV vs. XOVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the XOVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and XOVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLV vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, which is greater than XOVR's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and XOVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVXOVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-56.28%

-20.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.40%

-24.32%

-21.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.40%

-25.23%

-20.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.40%

-49.35%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.96%

-8.06%

-33.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-18.37%

-26.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.88%

11.02%

+9.86%

Volatility

SLV vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) at 8.27%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVXOVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

8.27%

+8.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.10%

16.23%

+42.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.82%

21.11%

+38.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.46%

26.31%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.00%

26.93%

+5.07%

SLV vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLV vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLV nor XOVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%57.75%6.31%0.08%3.71%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and XOVR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to XOVR (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs XOVR's -56.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 18.83% vs 5.40% for XOVR. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.

SLV and XOVR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SLV is categorized as Silver, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XOVR tracks ER30TR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and EntrepreneurShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.75% for XOVR.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and XOVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer