PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLV vs. SQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLV achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -45.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SLV has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 15.55%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -56.01% annualized return.


SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%

SQQQ

1D
0.76%
1M
-26.37%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-42.79%
1Y
-65.16%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-49.17%
10Y*
-56.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
-45.27%-53.05%-49.79%-73.61%82.40%-60.87%-86.40%-65.92%-20.83%-58.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SLV and SQQQ is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.17

The correlation between SLV and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SLV vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SLV
SQQQ

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

97.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SLV
100.0%
SQQQ

-

Communication Services

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Energy

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Financial Services

SLV

-

SQQQ
97.1%

Healthcare

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Industrials

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Real Estate

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Technology

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Utilities

SLV

-

SQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SQQQ
SQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
SQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLVSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.72

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.99

+3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

-1.82

+7.47

SLV vs. SQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the SQQQ Sharpe Ratio of -1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLV and SQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLVSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

-1.37

+3.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.74

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

-0.85

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-0.88

+1.12

Drawdowns

SLV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLV drawdown since its inception was -76.28%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLV and SQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLVSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-100.00%

+23.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

-65.95%

+23.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

-92.38%

+49.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

-97.23%

+54.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

-99.98%

+57.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-100.00%

+62.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.67%

-92.40%

+47.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.67%

35.73%

-16.06%

Volatility

SLV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 13.75%. This indicates that SLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLVSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

13.75%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.31%

36.45%

+21.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.90%

47.79%

+11.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.15%

66.64%

-30.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

66.11%

-34.27%

SLV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.48%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SQQQ
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ
12.48%9.36%10.23%8.01%0.28%0.00%2.15%2.92%1.47%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLV and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to SQQQ (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLV dropped -76.28% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs -56.01% for SQQQ. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs -56.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.

SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 12.48%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

SLV is categorized as Silver, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SLV and 0.95% for SQQQ.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLV and SQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer