SLTY vs. ESML
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and ESML (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while ESML is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Extended ESG Focus Index. SLTY is actively managed, while ESML is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ESML.
Performance
SLTY vs. ESML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than ESML's 18.00% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -3.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESML
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- YTD
- 18.00%
- 6M
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 34.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SLTY vs. ESML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -4.71% | -12.61% |
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 18.00% | 7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and ESML is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | -0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. ESML — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ESML
SLTY vs. ESML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF (ESML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLTY | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. ESML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum ESML drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and ESML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -41.97% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.73% | -1.21% | -15.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -8.91% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. ESML - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | ESML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 17.15% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 21.29% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.12% | 23.39% | -5.27% |
SLTY vs. ESML - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than ESML's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. ESML - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 77.13%, more than ESML's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESML iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.22% | 1.31% | 1.46% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.07% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 77.13% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and ESML have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESML is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESML is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 77.13%, compared with 0.92% for ESML.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ESML is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.17% for ESML.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and ESML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer