SLTY vs. EUSA
SLTY (YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF) and EUSA (iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while EUSA is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. SLTY is actively managed, while EUSA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. SLTY charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for EUSA.
Performance
SLTY vs. EUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLTY achieves a -8.50% return, which is significantly lower than EUSA's 11.73% return.
SLTY
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -8.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUSA
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
SLTY vs. EUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | -8.50% | -12.61% |
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 11.73% | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLTY and EUSA is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | -0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLTY vs. EUSA — Risk / Return Rank
SLTY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EUSA
SLTY vs. EUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF (SLTY) and iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLTY | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.68 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLTY vs. EUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLTY drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum EUSA drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLTY and EUSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLTY | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -39.16% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.05% | -0.56% | -19.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -4.57% | -10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
SLTY vs. EUSA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLTY | EUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 11.94% | +5.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 16.98% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 18.27% | -0.53% |
SLTY vs. EUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLTY has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSA's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLTY vs. EUSA - Dividend Comparison
SLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.52%, more than EUSA's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.47% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% |
SLTY YieldMax Ultra Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 88.52% | 29.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLTY and EUSA have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUSA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUSA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for SLTY.
SLTY has the higher dividend yield at 88.52%, compared with 1.45% for EUSA.
SLTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while EUSA is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.24% for SLTY and 0.09% for EUSA.
Find the right allocation for SLTY and EUSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer