SLQD vs. TBLYX
SLQD (iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and TBLYX (T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund) are both funds - SLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while TBLYX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. SLQD is passively managed, while TBLYX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SLQD returned 5.51%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for TBLYX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLQD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TBLYX.
Performance
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than TBLYX's 7.90% return.
SLQD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
TBLYX
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% | 6.27% | 4.94% | 5.98% | -4.38% | -0.81% |
TBLYX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund | 7.90% | 17.30% | 12.43% | 18.44% | -17.17% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLQD and TBLYX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLQD vs. TBLYX — Risk / Return Rank
SLQD
TBLYX
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLQD | TBLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.36 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 2.51 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.78 | 10.93 | +7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum TBLYX drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and TBLYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLQD | TBLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -24.54% | +11.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.06% | -7.83% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -13.02% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.58% | +1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -6.07% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 1.80% | -1.57% |
Volatility
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.53%, while T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund (TBLYX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLQD | TBLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 4.08% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 8.52% | -7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | 10.34% | -8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 13.11% | -10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 13.11% | -9.97% |
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TBLYX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLQD vs. TBLYX - Dividend Comparison
SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than TBLYX's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.15% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.55% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% |
TBLYX T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2035 Fund | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 2.18% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLQD and TBLYX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBLYX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to SLQD (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs TBLYX's -24.54%.
SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLQD and TBLYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer