PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLQD vs. SPBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLQD vs. SPBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPBO's 0.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLQD having a 2.66% annualized return and SPBO not far ahead at 2.77%.


SLQD

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.16%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
2.66%

SPBO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.47%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
2.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLQD vs. SPBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.84%6.27%4.94%5.98%-4.38%-0.61%4.76%6.09%1.09%2.12%
SPBO
SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
0.70%7.83%2.59%8.80%-15.68%-1.57%10.17%14.70%-1.79%5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between SLQD and SPBO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2013

0.61

Over the past year, SLQD and SPBO have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLQD vs. SPBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLQD
SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SPBO
SPBO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SPBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SPBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPBO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLQD vs. SPBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLQDSPBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.26

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

2.20

+2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.08

6.94

+12.14

SLQD vs. SPBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLQD Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the SPBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLQD and SPBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLQDSPBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

1.45

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.09

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.37

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.47

+0.37

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. SPBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum SPBO drawdown of -22.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and SPBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLQDSPBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-22.23%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-2.87%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-6.41%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-22.23%

+14.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.69%

-22.23%

+9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.91%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-4.04%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.91%

-0.68%

Volatility

SLQD vs. SPBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.46%, while SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF (SPBO) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLQDSPBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.35%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

3.21%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49%

4.36%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.44%

7.18%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

7.49%

-4.35%

SLQD vs. SPBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SPBO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLQD vs. SPBO - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than SPBO's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLQD
iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.32%4.15%3.71%2.99%2.00%1.67%2.34%2.89%2.55%1.98%1.81%1.43%
SPBO
SPDR Portfolio Corporate Bond ETF
5.12%5.09%5.28%4.73%3.54%2.42%2.75%3.46%3.60%3.15%3.35%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLQD and SPBO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPBO has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to SLQD (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs SPBO's -22.23%.

On 10-year performance, SPBO leads with 2.77% vs 2.66% for SLQD. On fees, SPBO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SLQD has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPBO has performed better with a 2.77% return vs 2.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPBO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SLQD.

SPBO has the higher dividend yield at 5.12%, compared with 4.32% for SLQD.

SLQD tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while SPBO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SLQD and 0.03% for SPBO.

SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLQD and SPBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer