SLQD vs. QCON

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON).

SLQD and QCON are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLQD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. QCON is an actively managed fund by American Century. It was launched on Feb 16, 2021.

Performance

SLQD vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLQD vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	-0.20%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

SLQD

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.59%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 4.74%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

QCON

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLQD vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.

QCON

American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF

SLQD

iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SLQD vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLQD

SLQD Risk / Return Rank: 97
SLQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SLQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
SLQD Omega Ratio Rank: 97
SLQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SLQD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLQD vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLQD	QCON	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.50	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLQD	QCON	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	—	—

Dividends

SLQD vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	3.89%	4.15%	3.71%	2.99%	2.00%	1.67%	2.34%	2.89%	2.55%	1.98%	1.81%	1.43%
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SLQD vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and QCON.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLQD	QCON	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	0.00%	-12.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	0.00%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLQD	QCON	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92%	0.00%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.43%	0.00%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.14%	0.00%	+3.14%