SLQD vs. FEBAX
SLQD (iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and FEBAX (First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A) are both funds - SLQD is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade 0-5 Index, while FEBAX is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by First Eagle. SLQD is passively managed, while FEBAX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLQD returned 2.71%/yr vs 8.60%/yr for FEBAX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLQD charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for FEBAX.
Performance
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLQD achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than FEBAX's 7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SLQD has underperformed FEBAX with an annualized return of 2.71%, while FEBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.
SLQD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.71%
FEBAX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 7.42%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 18.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% | 6.27% | 4.94% | 5.98% | -4.38% | -0.61% | 4.76% | 6.09% | 1.09% | 2.12% |
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A | 7.42% | 26.23% | 8.12% | 7.85% | -3.55% | 11.39% | 4.74% | 14.92% | -6.50% | 12.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLQD and FEBAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SLQD and FEBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLQD vs. FEBAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLQD
FEBAX
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) and First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLQD | FEBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.41 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.15 | 2.21 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.78 | 7.10 | +11.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLQD drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum FEBAX drawdown of -23.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLQD and FEBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLQD | FEBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -23.04% | +10.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.06% | -8.65% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.06% | -8.65% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.63% | -15.85% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.69% | -23.04% | +10.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -4.25% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.87% | -2.95% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 2.69% | -2.46% |
Volatility
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) is 0.53%, while First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A (FEBAX) has a volatility of 2.72%. This indicates that SLQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLQD | FEBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 2.72% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 7.51% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49% | 8.74% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.44% | 9.02% | -6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 9.26% | -6.12% |
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLQD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FEBAX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLQD vs. FEBAX - Dividend Comparison
SLQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than FEBAX's 3.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEBAX First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class A | 3.87% | 4.14% | 5.39% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 7.61% | 3.07% | 2.49% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.13% | 3.38% |
SLQD iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.15% | 3.71% | 2.99% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.34% | 2.89% | 2.55% | 1.98% | 1.81% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLQD and FEBAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEBAX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to SLQD (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLQD dropped -12.69% vs FEBAX's -23.04%.
SLQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLQD and FEBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer