ACT vs. ABR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR).

Performance

ACT vs. ABR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ACT vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACT Enact Holdings, Inc.	3.46%	25.20%	15.56%	25.78%	24.10%	6.61%
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.	2.99%	-36.65%	3.16%	29.73%	-20.73%	2.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACT : $5.93B ABR : $1.64B
EPS ACT : $4.55 ABR : $0.51
PE Ratio ACT : 8.97 ABR : 15.12
PS Ratio ACT : 4.90 ABR : 4.24
PB Ratio ACT : 1.11 ABR : 0.71
Total Revenue (TTM) ACT : $1.23B ABR : $382.72M
Gross Profit (TTM) ACT : $673.08M ABR : $232.49M
EBITDA (TTM) ACT : $907.59M ABR : $938.50M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACT achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's 2.99% return.

ACT

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: 3.46%
• 6M: 7.57%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 25.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABR

• 1D: 4.90%
• 1M: 0.78%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: -32.31%
• 1Y: -25.79%
• 3Y*: -0.88%
• 5Y*: -3.65%
• 10Y*: 12.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ACT vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACT

ACT Risk / Return Rank: 69
ACT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ACT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ACT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ACT Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ACT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ABR

ABR Risk / Return Rank: 17
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACT vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACT	ABR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	-0.64	+1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	-0.73	+2.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.91	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	-0.64	+2.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	-1.20	+5.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACT vs. ABR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACT Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the ABR Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACT and ABR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACT	ABR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	-0.64	+1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.08	+0.82

Correlation

The correlation between ACT and ABR is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ACT vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison

ACT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than ABR's 15.56% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACT Enact Holdings, Inc.	2.06%	2.06%	2.92%	4.60%	6.38%	5.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.	15.56%	17.14%	12.42%	11.07%	11.68%	7.53%	8.67%	7.94%	11.22%	8.33%	8.31%	8.11%

Drawdowns

ACT vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACT drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACT and ABR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACT	ABR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.25%	-97.76%	+77.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.96%	-40.49%	+29.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.19%	-40.61%	+33.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-41.83%	+36.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	21.57%	-16.72%

Volatility

ACT vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT) is 4.84%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that ACT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACT	ABR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	12.40%	-7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.14%	30.52%	-13.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.97%	40.43%	-16.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.91%	36.10%	-11.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.91%	39.77%	-14.86%

Financials