SLON vs. ZCSH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SLON tracks the Bloomberg Solana Index while ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ZCSH.

Performance

SLON vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's -12.85% return.

SLON

• 1D: -11.08%
• 1M: -37.46%
• YTD: -77.64%
• 6M: -77.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZCSH

• 1D: -6.64%
• 1M: -41.90%
• YTD: -12.85%
• 6M: -2.07%
• 1Y: 725.30%
• 3Y*: 137.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-77.64%	-62.89%
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)	-12.85%	756.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and ZCSH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

SLON vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCSH

ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLON	ZCSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	4.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	10.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.90	—

Drawdowns

SLON vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, roughly equal to the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and ZCSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	ZCSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.31%	-93.73%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-69.62%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-71.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.80%	-48.02%	-47.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.32%	-74.01%	+8.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	36.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLON	ZCSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	64.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	107.29%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.14%	174.37%	-26.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	148.14%	138.34%	+9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.14%	138.34%	+9.80%

SLON vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	25.68%	5.74%
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and ZCSH in my portfolio?

SLON and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLON or ZCSH?

On fees, SLON is cheaper at 2.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or ZCSH?

SLON is cheaper with a 2.14% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or ZCSH?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

What is the main difference between SLON and ZCSH?

SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 2.50% for ZCSH.