PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. ZCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. ZCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than ZCSH's 41.32% return.


SLON

1D
-9.37%
1M
-30.10%
YTD
-74.41%
6M
-81.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. ZCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-74.41%-62.58%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%749.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and ZCSH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. ZCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. ZCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLON vs. ZCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLONZCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.10

-0.73

Drawdowns

SLON vs. ZCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ZCSH drawdown of -93.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and ZCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONZCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.19%

-93.73%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.19%

-15.71%

-79.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.84%

-74.41%

+10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

Volatility

SLON vs. ZCSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONZCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.78%

166.02%

-19.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.78%

136.87%

+9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.78%

136.87%

+9.91%

SLON vs. ZCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCSH's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. ZCSH - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, while ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
22.44%5.74%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and ZCSH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SLON is cheaper at 2.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLON is cheaper with a 2.14% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 2.50% for ZCSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and ZCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer