PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. DABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than DABS's 1.10% return.


SLON

1D
-11.08%
1M
-37.46%
YTD
-77.64%
6M
-77.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DABS

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.36%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-77.64%-62.89%
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
1.10%3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and DABS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLONDABSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

SLON vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLON vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and DABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONDABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.31%

-1.47%

-94.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.80%

-0.27%

-95.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.32%

-0.31%

-65.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

Volatility

SLON vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONDABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.14%

2.46%

+145.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.14%

2.55%

+145.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.14%

2.55%

+145.59%

SLON vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than DABS's 4.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.88%3.81%
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
25.68%5.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and DABS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.40% for DABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and DABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer