SLON vs. DABS
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. SLON is passively managed, while DABS is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.
Performance
SLON vs. DABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than DABS's 1.10% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -11.08%
- 1M
- -37.46%
- YTD
- -77.64%
- 6M
- -77.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -77.64% | -62.89% |
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.10% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and DABS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DABS
SLON vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and DABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -1.47% | -94.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.80% | -0.27% | -95.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -0.31% | -65.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.38% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 2.46% | +145.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 2.55% | +145.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 2.55% | +145.59% |
SLON vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than DABS's 4.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.88% | 3.81% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 25.68% | 5.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and DABS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.40% for DABS.
Find the right allocation for SLON and DABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer