SLON vs. BCI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while BCI is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. SLON is passively managed, while BCI is actively managed. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for BCI.

Performance

SLON vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -76.74% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 25.35% return.

SLON

• 1D: -9.11%
• 1M: -39.41%
• YTD: -76.74%
• 6M: -82.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.58%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 24.07%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: 15.51%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-76.74%	-62.58%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	25.35%	7.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and BCI is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.00

Return for Risk

SLON vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 70
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLON	BCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.64	0.47	-1.11

Drawdowns

SLON vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.63%	-32.69%	-62.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.63%	-5.52%	-90.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.98%	-12.00%	-51.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLON	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.23%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.73%	16.96%	+129.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.73%	16.81%	+129.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.73%	15.65%	+131.08%

SLON vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.69%, more than BCI's 13.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	13.15%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	24.69%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and BCI in my portfolio?

SLON and BCI have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLON or BCI?

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or BCI?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 24.69%, compared with 13.15% for BCI.

What is the main difference between SLON and BCI?

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.25% for BCI.