SLMCX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 5.76% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -6.10% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -6.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has outperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 22.87%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.80% annualized return.
SLMCX
- 1D
- 5.57%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 31.63%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.87%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -5.08%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 20.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLMCX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLMCX
CTCAX
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMCX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.24 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 1.84 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.26 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 2.30 | +2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 8.07 | +8.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMCX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.24 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.50 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.84 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMCX and CTCAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.94%, more than CTCAX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 8.94% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.50% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than CTCAX's maximum drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMCX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.10% | -61.04% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -14.43% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.32% | -39.55% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -39.55% | +2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -10.51% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -10.75% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 4.12% | -0.17% |
Volatility
SLMCX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) at 8.94%. This indicates that SLMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLMCX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 8.94% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.67% | 16.85% | +4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.99% | 27.31% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 25.88% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 24.70% | +1.29% |