SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE
SLMB.DE (iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - SLMB.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Screened Index while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLMB.DE returned 10.71%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLMB.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMB.DE achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 24.81% return.
SLMB.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 20.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 22.10%
- YTD
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.52%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMB.DE iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 10.88% | 22.96% | 9.33% | 19.66% | -12.70% | 22.35% | 0.18% | 26.56% | -7.21% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 24.81% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -15.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMB.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SLMB.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLMB.DE
XB4A.DE
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SLMB.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLMB.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.44 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 15.07 | -7.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMB.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMB.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMB.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.65% | -53.54% | +15.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -10.88% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | -16.26% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -32.50% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -1.85% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.33% | -9.88% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.22% | -0.48% |
Volatility
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SLMB.DE) is 3.82%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that SLMB.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLMB.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 5.22% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 14.88% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 17.61% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 19.15% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 20.15% | -2.19% |
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMB.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SLMB.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
SLMB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMB.DE iShares MSCI EMU Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.51% | 2.71% | 3.02% | 2.74% | 2.88% | 1.99% | 1.67% | 2.91% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLMB.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLMB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLMB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
SLMB.DE tracks MSCI EMU Screened Index, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SLMB.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLMB.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer