BRKR vs. AMAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bruker Corporation (BRKR) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).

Performance

BRKR vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bruker Corporation (BRKR) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BRKR vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BRKR Bruker Corporation	-23.30%	-19.24%	-19.99%	7.82%	-18.29%	55.35%	6.58%	71.85%	-12.82%	62.96%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	37.84%	59.60%	1.13%	67.97%	-37.54%	83.64%	43.29%	89.86%	-34.92%	59.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BRKR : $5.50B AMAT : $282.69B
EPS BRKR : -$0.06 AMAT : $9.73
PS Ratio BRKR : 1.60 AMAT : 10.10
PB Ratio BRKR : 2.22 AMAT : 13.02
Total Revenue (TTM) BRKR : $3.44B AMAT : $28.21B
Gross Profit (TTM) BRKR : $1.60B AMAT : $13.75B
EBITDA (TTM) BRKR : $316.00M AMAT : $9.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRKR achieves a -23.30% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 37.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BRKR has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 2.53%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.86% annualized return.

BRKR

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -9.23%
• YTD: -23.30%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: -10.17%
• 3Y*: -22.64%
• 5Y*: -10.78%
• 10Y*: 2.53%

AMAT

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: 37.84%
• 6M: 63.01%
• 1Y: 145.07%
• 3Y*: 43.51%
• 5Y*: 21.14%
• 10Y*: 33.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BRKR vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRKR

BRKR Risk / Return Rank: 31
BRKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BRKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
BRKR Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BRKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
BRKR Martin Ratio Rank: 28

AMAT

AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRKR vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bruker Corporation (BRKR) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BRKR	AMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	2.97	-3.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.10	3.15	-3.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.44	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	6.83	-7.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	18.96	-19.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BRKR vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRKR Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRKR and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BRKR	AMAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	2.97	-3.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	0.49	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.80	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.41	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between BRKR and AMAT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BRKR vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

BRKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, more than AMAT's 0.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BRKR Bruker Corporation	0.55%	0.42%	0.34%	0.27%	0.29%	0.19%	0.30%	0.31%	0.54%	0.47%	0.76%	0.00%
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	0.52%	0.69%	0.93%	0.75%	1.05%	0.60%	1.01%	1.36%	2.14%	0.78%	1.24%	2.14%

Drawdowns

BRKR vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRKR drawdown since its inception was -94.83%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKR and AMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BRKR	AMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.83%	-85.22%	-9.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.85%	-21.37%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.72%	-55.14%	-13.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.72%	-55.14%	-13.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.39%	-10.42%	-50.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.74%	-38.96%	-18.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.05%	7.70%	+10.35%

Volatility

BRKR vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bruker Corporation (BRKR) is 13.32%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that BRKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BRKR	AMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.32%	16.53%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.52%	35.07%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.34%	49.20%	+5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.71%	43.23%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.73%	42.40%	-5.67%

Financials

BRKR vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bruker Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BRKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bruker Corporation reported a gross profit of 466.80M and revenue of 977.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

BRKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bruker Corporation reported an operating income of 76.30M and revenue of 977.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

BRKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bruker Corporation reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 977.20M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.