SLJY vs. 1816.HK

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while 1816.HK (CGN Power) is a stock. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SLJY vs. 1816.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and CGN Power (1816.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SLJY is traded in USD, while 1816.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1816.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a -10.91% return, which is significantly lower than 1816.HK's 0.63% return.

SLJY

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -11.40%
• 6M: -23.95%
• YTD: -10.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

1816.HK

• 1D: 5.52%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: -5.63%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 1Y: 4.32%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 15.82%
• 10Y*: 6.60%
• ALL TIME*: 2.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. 1816.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	-10.91%	42.11%
1816.HK CGN Power	0.63%	-7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and 1816.HK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

SLJY vs. 1816.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLJY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

1816.HK

1816.HK Risk / Return Rank: 49
1816.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
1816.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
1816.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
1816.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
1816.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLJY vs. 1816.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and CGN Power (1816.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLJY	1816.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.17	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.47	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.44	—

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. 1816.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum 1816.HK drawdown of -68.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and 1816.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLJY	1816.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-68.30%	+33.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-35.19%	-20.80%	-14.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.33%	-46.90%	+34.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLJY	1816.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.47%	26.56%	+22.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.47%	30.39%	+19.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.47%	26.54%	+22.93%

Dividends

SLJY vs. 1816.HK - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.85%, more than 1816.HK's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1816.HK CGN Power	3.42%	3.52%	3.62%	4.74%	5.31%	4.08%	4.97%	4.05%	4.48%	2.73%	2.34%	0.11%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	22.85%	6.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLJY and 1816.HK in my portfolio?

SLJY and 1816.HK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.