PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1816.HK vs. MMA.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CGN Power (1816.HK) and Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1816.HK is traded in HKD, while MMA.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the MMA.AX values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1816.HK achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than MMA.AX's -0.16% return.


1816.HK

1D
0.63%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
11.55%
6M
6.12%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
7.60%

MMA.AX

1D
-1.80%
1M
25.17%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
19.42%
1Y
86.82%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
1816.HK
CGN Power
11.55%7.04%44.53%15.25%-12.00%
MMA.AX
Maronan Metals Limited
-0.16%116.04%-28.35%-5.43%-19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between 1816.HK and MMA.AX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2022

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1816.HK
1816.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
1816.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1816.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
1816.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
1816.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
1816.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MMA.AX
MMA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGN Power (1816.HK) and Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1816.HKMMA.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.58

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

3.00

+1.12

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1816.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the MMA.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1816.HK and MMA.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1816.HKMMA.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.95

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.05

+0.07

Drawdowns

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1816.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.29%, which is greater than MMA.AX's maximum drawdown of -57.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1816.HK and MMA.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1816.HKMMA.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.29%

-57.13%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-54.45%

+37.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.46%

-54.45%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.61%

-40.37%

+27.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.89%

-37.07%

-9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

28.77%

-22.31%

Volatility

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CGN Power (1816.HK) is 7.03%, while Maronan Metals Limited (MMA.AX) has a volatility of 23.98%. This indicates that 1816.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMA.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1816.HKMMA.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

23.98%

-16.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.43%

72.08%

-52.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.97%

90.47%

-64.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.17%

77.07%

-46.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

77.07%

-50.30%

Dividends

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Dividend Comparison

1816.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while MMA.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1816.HK
CGN Power
3.11%3.52%3.62%4.74%5.31%4.08%4.97%4.05%4.48%2.73%2.34%0.11%
MMA.AX
Maronan Metals Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

1816.HK vs. MMA.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CGN Power and Maronan Metals Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 1816.HK values in HKD, MMA.AX values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


1816.HK and MMA.AX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1816.HK and MMA.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer