PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1816.HK vs. OILY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CGN Power (1816.HK) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1816.HK is traded in HKD, while OILY.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OILY.TO values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1816.HK achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than OILY.TO's 35.66% return.


1816.HK

1D
0.63%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
11.55%
6M
6.12%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
7.60%

OILY.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.09%
YTD
35.66%
6M
31.54%
1Y
51.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
1816.HK
CGN Power
11.55%22.03%
OILY.TO
Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
35.66%8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between 1816.HK and OILY.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1816.HK
1816.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
1816.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1816.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
1816.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
1816.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
1816.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

OILY.TO
OILY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
OILY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGN Power (1816.HK) and Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1816.HKOILY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

5.27

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

14.17

-10.05

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1816.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the OILY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1816.HK and OILY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1816.HKOILY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.62

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.52

-1.40

Drawdowns

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1816.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.29%, which is greater than OILY.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1816.HK and OILY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1816.HKOILY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.29%

-21.95%

-46.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-9.85%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.61%

-3.49%

-9.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.89%

-3.65%

-43.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

3.66%

+2.80%

Volatility

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CGN Power (1816.HK) is 7.03%, while Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (OILY.TO) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that 1816.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1816.HKOILY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

7.92%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.43%

16.54%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.97%

19.85%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.17%

25.47%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.77%

25.47%

+1.30%

Dividends

1816.HK vs. OILY.TO - Dividend Comparison

1816.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than OILY.TO's 12.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1816.HK
CGN Power
3.11%3.52%3.62%4.74%5.31%4.08%4.97%4.05%4.48%2.73%2.34%0.11%
OILY.TO
Evolve Canadian Energy Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF
12.58%11.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


1816.HK and OILY.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1816.HK and OILY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer