SLB vs. JFLI
SLB (Schlumberger Limited) is a stock, while JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) is Global Allocation fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Over the past year, SLB returned 61.98% vs 19.16% for JFLI. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLB vs. JFLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a 48.01% return, which is significantly higher than JFLI's 9.19% return.
SLB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 48.01%
- 6M
- 44.00%
- 1Y
- 61.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- -0.34%
JFLI
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLB vs. JFLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 48.01% | -5.14% |
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 9.19% | 9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and JFLI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLB vs. JFLI — Risk / Return Rank
SLB
JFLI
SLB vs. JFLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLB | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 2.88 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 13.53 | -2.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLB vs. JFLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.64%, which is greater than JFLI's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and JFLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLB | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.64% | -12.87% | -74.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | -6.67% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.53% | -0.97% | -32.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.18% | -1.44% | -29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 1.42% | +4.25% |
Volatility
SLB vs. JFLI - Volatility Comparison
Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) at 3.86%. This indicates that SLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JFLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLB | JFLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 3.86% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.72% | 7.63% | +18.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.73% | 8.98% | +24.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.63% | 12.09% | +25.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.41% | 12.09% | +28.32% |
Dividends
SLB vs. JFLI - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than JFLI's 7.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | 7.24% | 6.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 2.06% | 2.97% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 2.09% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLB and JFLI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLB has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to JFLI (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLB dropped -87.64% vs JFLI's -12.87%.
JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLB and JFLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer