PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFLI vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFLI vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFLI achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.73% return.


JFLI

1D
0.05%
1M
3.14%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.72%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGGH

1D
0.25%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.07%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
4.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFLI vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
9.95%9.49%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
0.73%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between JFLI and AGGH is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.18

JFLI vs. AGGH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JFLI
AGGH

Technology

28.4%

-

Financial Services

10.4%
79.5%

Communication Services

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.1%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Healthcare

7.2%

-

Utilities

6.5%

-

Energy

5.0%

-

Real Estate

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%

-

Technology

JFLI
28.4%
AGGH

-

Financial Services

JFLI
10.4%
AGGH
79.5%

Communication Services

JFLI
9.8%
AGGH

-

Consumer Cyclical

JFLI
9.3%
AGGH

-

Consumer Defensive

JFLI
8.1%
AGGH

-

Industrials

JFLI
7.8%
AGGH

-

Healthcare

JFLI
7.2%
AGGH

-

Utilities

JFLI
6.5%
AGGH

-

Energy

JFLI
5.0%
AGGH

-

Real Estate

JFLI
4.6%
AGGH

-

Basic Materials

JFLI
3.1%
AGGH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFLI vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFLI vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFLIAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.22

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.60

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.29

7.58

+7.71

JFLI vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFLI Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFLI and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFLIAGGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.15

+1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.28

+1.02

Drawdowns

JFLI vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFLI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, roughly equal to the maximum AGGH drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLI and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFLIAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-13.26%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-3.10%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.33%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-4.45%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.06%

+0.32%

Volatility

JFLI vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.55%. This indicates that JFLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFLIAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

1.55%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

3.33%

+3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.38%

7.11%

+1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.88%

8.45%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.88%

8.45%

+3.43%

JFLI vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFLI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFLI vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than AGGH's 7.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.51%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.81%6.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFLI and AGGH have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFLI has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to AGGH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFLI dropped -12.87% vs AGGH's -13.26%.

On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.01% vs 8.03% for AGGH. On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AGGH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.01% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JFLI.

JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.81%, compared with 7.51% for AGGH.

JFLI is categorized as Global Allocation, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JFLI and 0.33% for AGGH.

JFLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFLI and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer